And consider the following quote from Ignacio on page
38:
>>> To all appearances, we enjoy the highest of
privileges: the design,
working and goals of the whole, infinite
multicosmos, are subservient at all
costs under individual
liberty. It is a mind-boggling paradox that the
boundless,
all-inclusive Ultimate Reality revolves around no less than
the
self-determination of vital entities. In witness whereof, we
may
infer the uttermost importance and sacred value the
omnisphere grants to the
freedom of its children, wherefrom human
sovereignty epitomizes the apex,
cornerstone and crowning point
of All That Is.<<<
Has it ever been stated better
than this?
Dan
'best possible world'
http://correo.hispavista.com/Redirect/home.comcast.net/~dantsmith
-----Original
Message-----
From: Dan Smith [http://correo.hispavista.com/Session/281761-OlU9zW7R1qh2dknoFuip/Compose.html?To=dantsmith@comcast.net]
Sent:
Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: The Principle
of Cosmic Elusiveness
Thank you, Jack....
I
heartily recommend a careful reading of this most unusual
opus.
Ignacio follows in the tradition of Charles Forte and
Jacques Vallee.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Matrix, i.e.
metaphysical hyperspace,
unconstrained by our most daring Grand
Unified Theories.
My only caveat is that Ignacio emphasizes
pantheism at the expense of
theism. There is a cosmic Rationale
or Gnosis, beyond the reach of all
GUTs, of which we partake, and
which will guide us in our journey beyond
the
stars.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Joel Isaacson [http://correo.hispavista.com/Session/281761-OlU9zW7R1qh2dknoFuip/Compose.html?To=isaacsonj@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:21 PM
To: sarfatti@pacbell.net;
dantsmith@comcast.net
Cc: lensman@sbcglobal.net;
sirag@mindspring.com;
yokatta@oxy.edu;
sharkley1@panzerben1.fsworld.co.uk
Subject:
RE: Fwd: The Principle of Cosmic Elusiveness
Hard to wade
thru these 64-page polemics... but at least he mentions
Jacob's
ladder ;-) see p. 19.
What does come across (for moi) is a
"realization" that much of the stuff in
the universe is "hidden";
be it "physical" stuff or "informational"
stuff... that our
senses never evolved to grasp hidden/concealed stuff
--
therefore
we are easily fooled by those who may have access
to it, and/or know are
to handle it and/or manipulate us thru
it.... that we may need
"steganogramic"
decoding methodologies
to gain access to "fantomark" realms... within
which we are
totally immersed... and so it goes, on and on...
Needless to
say, "dark energy" or ZPE (and earlier Bohmian concepts),
and
similar such, fall under the rubric of fantomark realms...
=j=
>From: Jack Sarfatti
<sarfatti@pacbell.net>
>To: Dan Smith
<dantsmith@comcast.net>
>CC: Joel Isaacson
<isaacsonj@hotmail.com>, Kim
Burrafato
><lensman@sbcglobal.net>, S-P Sirag
<sirag@mindspring.com>, Scott
Littleton
><yokatta@oxy.edu>, Colin Bennett
<sharkley1@panzerben1.fsworld.co.uk>
>Subject: Fwd: The
Principle of Cosmic Elusiveness
>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004
13:37:36 -0700
>
>
>
>Begin forwarded
message:
>
>>From: "Ignacio Darnaude"
<ummo@hispavista.com>
>>Date: August 26, 2004
12:17:01 PM PDT
>>To: "Sarfatti Jack"
<sarfatti@well.com>
>>Subject: The Principle of
Cosmic Elusiveness
>>
>>Ignacio Darnaude
Rojas-Marcos
>>Cabeza del Rey Don Pedro , 9 ( 2º B
)
>>41004 - Sevilla ( Spain )
>>Página Web :
www.galeon.com/darnaude
>>E-Mail :
ummo@hispavista.com
>>
|
